Decision support for local government · since 2013

Better decisions. More public trust. Less wasted staff time.

Governance Sciences Group equips cities, counties, school districts, and special districts with decision‑support technology and expertise — so every choice is rigorous, transparent, and grounded in what your community actually thinks.

Better decisions grounded in real community input
More public trust through rigor & transparency
Greater efficiency less staff time, faster cycles
Bar chart forming a bell curve, representing statistically valid, representative community input
34 stateswhere local governments trust GSG
$400M+in costly mistakes avoided
Since 2013delivering rigorous, transparent decisions

Problems we solve

Built for cities, counties, school districts, and special districts. Find the challenge on your desk today.

Community input

Only the loudest voices get heard

Get representative, statistically valid input from your whole community. → FlashVote

Event & service feedback

No read on how events and services land

Quick, easy pulse checks to see how residents reacted. → FlashFeedback

Meeting prep

Officials arrive underprepared

Sharper questions and better decisions in the room. → FlashSummary

Staff time

Memos eat staff time — and still have gaps

Draft faster, catch gaps before review. → FlashMemo

Onboarding

New officials unsure of their role

Training from public‑input best practices to roles & responsibilities. → FlashTraining

Hard decisions

A tough decision with no clear path

Best practices and lessons from communities like yours. → Consulting

Workforce

Staff morale and retention are slipping

Confidential, representative input from your employees so you can act on what matters. → Employee Surveys

Public trust

Public trust is eroding

Rigorous, transparent processes the community can stand behind. → The whole platform

Our portfolio

Decision‑support tools and services that move decisions forward — outcomes first.

FlashVote

Hear from your whole community, not just the vocal few — representative, statistically valid input in days.

See FlashVote →

FlashFeedback

Quick pulse checks on public events and services — fast, easy feedback on how residents reacted.

See FlashFeedback →

Employee Surveys

Understand your workforce — representative, actionable input from staff to improve morale, retention, and internal decisions.

Explore employee surveys →

FlashSummary

Walk into every meeting prepared — expert AI analysis of agendas so officials ask essential questions and decide with confidence.

Get a demo →

FlashMemo

Better agenda memos, faster — surface gaps before review and cut internal turnaround time.

See FlashMemo →

FlashTraining

Confident, capable officials and staff — training from public‑input best practices to roles and responsibilities.

View training →

Consulting

A hard issue on your desk? Bring in proven best practices and lessons from communities like yours.

Explore consulting →

Not sure which fits?

Tell us about the decision on your desk and we’ll point you to the right tool or service. Talk to us →

Trusted by local governments and special districts across North America

Orange County Fair & Event Center City of University Place Town of Sudbury City of Duarte City of Pacifica City of Citrus Heights City of Mont Belvieu City of Fairfield City of Chanhassen City of Bedford City of South Salt Lake City of Beavercreek City of Georgetown City of Valdez City of Norco City of Watertown City of Powder Springs City of Portsmouth City of College Station City of Gig Harbor City of Rancho Cordova City of Norwalk Town of Natick City of Ogden City of Granbury City of North Richland Hills City of Novi Town of Saugeen Shores Town of Amherstburg City of La Cañada Flintridge City of Solvang Town of West Springfield City of Canyon Town of Cumberland City of Jacksonville Beach Town of Waxhaw County of Columbia City of Taylor City of Manhattan Beach City of Sacramento City of St. Cloud City of Midlothian County of Summit City of Pleasanton Sienna Plantation Residential Association, Inc. dba Sienna Associations City of Naples County of Peoria City of Cottonwood Heights City of Lancaster City of Titusville Municipality of Lambton Shores City of Arroyo Grande City of Munroe Falls City of Artesia City of Blaine County of Walker City of Arcata City of Oneonta Telluride Mountain Village Owners Association Town of Wilbraham City of Wichita Falls Town of Fountain Hills City of Groveland City of Seabrook City of Raymore Greater Portland Council of Governments Town of Windham Town of Cape Elizabeth

What local governments say about FlashVote

“FlashVote is like smartphones when they first came out… how did I live without this?”

— Francie Palmer, Public Information Officer & CAPIO Communicator of the Year, City of Rancho Cucamonga, CA

“I can’t imagine not having FlashVote available to me!”

— Laurie Hokkanen, Administrative Services Director, City of Plymouth, MN

“FlashVote has proven to be incredibly valuable in our efforts to engage.”

— Kurt Althof, Grants & Public Information Administrator, Tahoe City Public Utility District, CA

“FlashVote’s expertise in survey design and their knowledge of how local government works are invaluable.”

— Jen Merino, Community Relations Coordinator, Placer County, CA

Read more testimonials →

Real decisions, defended with data

Special district · trash service

How one district avoided a $7 million mistake

A special district was set to move ahead with a proposed trash‑service change. A FlashVote survey showed two‑thirds of the community were against it — because underlying problems hadn’t been fixed first. The board paused, avoided a $7 million mistake, and kept the community’s trust.

See more case studies →

33% vs. 85%

A town’s online survey showed 85% support for a community‑center rebuild. FlashVote’s representative survey showed just 33% — later confirmed by an actual public vote.

2‑to‑1 → $50M approved

With vocal opponents dominating the room, a FlashVote survey found over 2‑to‑1 support, giving the city the confidence to approve a $50 million project.

85% in 48 hours

A special district ran an anonymous employee survey with 85% participation in two days — at a fraction of a consultant’s cost.

Ready to make a decision with confidence?